Rawat language resources | Joshua Project

Home People Groups Lists Language: Rawat

Language: Rawat

Estimated Global Speakers

5,500

People Groups Speaking as Primary Language

Scripture Status

Translation Started

Audio Bible

Not Available

Jesus Film

Not Available

Gospel Recordings

Listen

Map Notes

Click column headings for sorting ▲▼
Photo	People Group ▲	Country	Population	Progress Scale
	No reported people groups speaking this as primary language
	Totals: 0			0 ●

Click column headings for sorting ▲▼
People Group ▲	Country	Population	Progress Scale
Bairagi (Hindu traditions)	Nepal	280,000	0 ☀
Bhotia	India	135,000	1 ●
Brahmin unspecified	India	34,711,000	0 ☀
Chhetri	India	293,000	1 ●
Chhetri	Nepal	5,035,000	1 ●
Gurung Ghaleg	Nepal	603,000	2 ●
Kami	India	110,000	1 ●
Kisan	Nepal	2,600	1 ●
Majhi	Nepal	96,000	1 ●
Mech	Nepal	5,700	1 ●
Munda, Horo	Nepal	2,600	2 ●
Newah	Nepal	1,514,000	1 ●
Oraon, Dhangar	Nepal	45,000	1 ●
Raji	India	2,400	1 ●
Rajput (Hindu traditions)	India	27,490,000	0 ☀
Rawat	India	923,000	0 ☀
Tharu unspecified	Nepal	1,753,000	1 ●
Yadav (Hindu traditions)	Nepal	1,042,000	0 ☀
Yakthumba, Limbu	Nepal	444,000	1 ●
Totals: 19			17 ●

Download Data Data Sources Definitions

Item	Value
Status	Living
Ethnologue Code	jnl
Written	Unknown
Bible Translation	Started
Progress Scale	●

Language Alternate Names
Ban Manus
Ban Rauts
Bãt-kha
Bhulla
Dzanggali
Jangali
Janggali
Jhangar
Raji
Raut

Dialects
Janggali Rawat

Dialect Alternate Names
Rawat

Bible Translation	Year / Status
Bible Portions	None Reported
New Testament	None Reported
Complete Bible	None Reported

Possible Print Bibles
Not Available

Resource Directories
Scripture Earth
Language Archives
Linguist List
SIL Resources

Click column headings for sorting ▲▼
Format ▲	Resource (Direct link)	Source (General link)
Audio Recordings	Audio Bible teaching	Global Recordings Network

The Joshua Project Progress Scale is an estimate of the progress of church planting among a people group, people cluster, country or language. The Progress Scale is derived from people group values for percent Evangelical and percent Christian Adherent.

Level	Description	Criteria
1	Unreached - Few evangelicals and few who identify as Christians. Little, if any, history of Christianity.	Evangelicals <= 2% Professing Christians <= 5%
2	Minimally reached - Few evangelicals, but significant number who identify as Christians.	Evangelicals <= 2% Professing Christians > 5% and <= 50%
3	Superficially reached - Few evangelicals, but many who identify as Christians. In great need of spiritual renewal and commitment to biblical faith.	Evangelicals <= 2% Professing Christians > 50%
4	Partially reached - Evangelicals have a modest presence.	Evangelicals > 2% and <= 10%
5	Significantly reached - Evangelicals have a significant presence.	Evangelicals > 10%

Disclaimers:

Joshua Project data is drawn from many sources and of varying accuracy depending on source and editorial decisions. Populations are scaled to the current year. Other data may have varying ages. We welcome updates.
Joshua Project occasionally adjusts profile text from third party sources. This is done to avoid confusion regarding the current reality of a people group, to fix grammar and spelling and to avoid potentially offensive wording.
A displayed zero can mean true zero, a very small rounded number or sometimes unknown. Blanks mean an unknown value.
Data is not as precise as it appears. Values for %Christian Adherent and %Evangelical (which determine unreached status) are often informed estimates, some more accurate than others. We recommend against using %Christian Adherent and %Evangelical to calculate absolute numbers.
Joshua Project makes every effort to ensure that the subject in an image is in fact from the specific people group. In rare instances a representative photo may be used.
Joshua Project may be able to provide more information than what is published on this site. Please contact us.
On-the-ground reality may vary from what is presented here. Before making travel plans based on data presented here, please confirm with other sources to the extent possible.

Frontier Ventures